Post details: GNOME-2.16 in unstable

14 October, 2006

Permalink 01:14 UTC, by Mart Raudsepp Email , 165 words, 1844 views   English (US)
Categories: Gentoo, GNOME

GNOME-2.16 in unstable

Yes. That's right.
GNOME-2.16 is out of package.mask and now nearing your unstable ~arch systems closest mirror with the speed of, :-/, electrons.
This is currently a 2.16.1 version of it.
For the rare (sub)profiles using Linux kernel version 2.4, GNOME-2.16 will stay masked, due to it requiring HAL (Hardware Abstraction Layer) quite heavily. The Linux version of it uses udev, which is new in 2.6 kernel. These profiles will however now get gtk+-2.10 with the necessary dependencies in their ~arch.

There is an upgrading guide over here:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/gnome/howtos/gnome-2.16-upgrade.xml

It is likely that it will gain more items to it over time as things come up.

Enjoy! I know I am.
For the stable machines, well, the clock is ticking now.

Thanks to the GNOME desktop team for pulling this through!
I just got to do the finishing touches B)

Oh and I received a Gentoo GNOME team member badge some time ago for some reason :>>

Trackback address for this post:

http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/htsrv/trackback.php/1002

Comments, Trackbacks, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Giacomo [Visitor] Email
You did not unmask mono and gtkmm/glibmm. Are they supposed to be unmasked later or it was a inadvertence?
PermalinkPermalink 14 October, 2006 @ 09:24
Comment from: Giacomo [Visitor] Email
Sorry, I meant dev-dotnet/*-sharp
PermalinkPermalink 14 October, 2006 @ 09:25
Comment from: postmodern [Visitor] Email
Hopefully this will also disappear from package.mask since gnome-2.16 is on it's way to stable.

# Patrick McLean <chutzpah@gentoo.org> (25 Sep 2006)
# This depends on dev-cpp/cairomm which is in the Gnome 2.16 mask, so masking
# until Gnome 2.16 is unmasked
=media-sound/bmpx-0.3*
PermalinkPermalink 14 October, 2006 @ 21:52
Comment from: Mart Raudsepp [Member] Email
C++, mono and java bindings were not unmasked on purpose just yet. The respective herd teams for these will have to take care of this - see http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132627
There are some things to sort out wrt some subprofiles having GNOME-2.16 masked due to 2.4 kernel, so they'll need to figure out which need to be masked and which not (e.g, gtk bindings should be possible to unmask, while a vte bindings that requires the newer vte can't be) in these profiles.
PermalinkPermalink 15 October, 2006 @ 03:52
Comment from: Imre [Visitor] Email
Nice :))
PermalinkPermalink 15 October, 2006 @ 16:58

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))

Mart Raudsepp

August 2008
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
<< <     
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Search

Categories

Misc

XML Feeds

What is RSS?

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 39

powered by
b2evolution